<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maine SEO Blog &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maine-seo.com/tag/bing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maine-seo.com</link>
	<description>A blog on SEO and SEM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>5 Ways to Rank Better at Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/5-ways-to-rank-better-at-bing</link>
		<comments>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/5-ways-to-rank-better-at-bing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maine-seo.com/?p=1153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is still king, but Microsoft&#8217;s Bing has been getting a lot of press (I do enjoy the Bing! noise). So while I will forever optimize for Google first, it&#8217;s important to understand what other search engines care about. For the most part, Bing follows the trends of other search engines: title tags, headers, meta-descriptions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fsearch-engines%2F5-ways-to-rank-better-at-bing"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fsearch-engines%2F5-ways-to-rank-better-at-bing&amp;source=flytenewmedia&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p style="text-align: left;">Google is still king, but <a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/whats-the-consensus-with-bing" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s Bing</a> has been getting a lot of press (I <em>do</em> enjoy the Bing! noise). So while I will forever optimize for Google first, it&#8217;s important to <a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/is-it-possible-to-optimize-for-every-search-engine" target="_blank">understand what other search engines care about</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">For the most part, Bing follows the trends of other search engines: title tags, headers, meta-descriptions, and links (both incoming and intra-site) are all important. There are, however, some differences that Bing appears to hold near and dear; and here&#8217;s what you can do to accommodate the newest search engine&#8230;</p>
<h3><strong>1. Get the Bing Toolbox</strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-1185  aligncenter" title="bing toolbox" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bing-toolbox.jpg" alt="bing toolbox" width="434" height="28" /></p>
<p>Like <a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/google/9-reasons-why-you-need-googles-webmaster-tools" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools</a>, the Bing Toolbox is a great way to discover errors more quickly. It also has a unique set of interesting data for your statistical pleasure, including backlinks and outbound links, crawl dates, and a keyword tool to show how well your site is optimized for them. You can also submit your site to Bing through the Toolbox.</p>
<h3>2. Focus on your URLs</h3>
<p>Bing is especially aware of keywords in domains and URLs. Just take a look at the screen shot below. A search for &#8220;Maine SEO&#8221; lands this blog in the first two spots!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/keywords-and-phrases/should-i-purchase-a-keyword-rich-domain-and-redirect-it" target="_blank">As I&#8217;ve talked about before</a>, Google puts little, if any, weight on keyword rich domains or URLs. Established URLs are the name of the game for Google, but it seems that if you want to rank well at Bing, you&#8217;d best get yourself some keyword rich URLs.</p>
<h3>3. Rely on exact match</h3>
<p>Similarly, Bing focuses on exact match keywords. While Google is of the school of related match, you&#8217;d best know which keywords your customers are searching for. Obviously this has both benefits and downfalls.</p>
<h3>4. Age matters</h3>
<p>Unfortunately for bloggers and new sites, it seems that Bing is focused on older sites that have built reputation with age. Not a whole lot you can do here other than sit around and wait. It does cause you to think twice before creating a new domain, rather than sticking with an established one (hint: always pick the latter).</p>
<h3>5. Think about anchor text before quantity&#8230;or quality</h3>
<p>Anchor text is important to all search engines, but evidently with Bing it&#8217;s even <em>more</em> important than the quality or quantity of backlinks. Most likely, this is the reasoning behind #3 and coincidentally #2, as more often than not, sites will link using the same keywords used in the domain/URL.</p>
<p>See how the two compare for the same &#8220;maine seo&#8221; query:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en-us&amp;q=maine+seo&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1183 alignnone" title="google maine seo" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/google-maine-seo-284x300.jpg" alt="google maine seo" width="256" height="270" /></a><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=maine+seo&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;qs=n"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1184" title="bing maine seo" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/bing-maine-seo-300x300.jpg" alt="bing maine seo" width="243" height="243" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flyte.biz/internet-marketing/seo/" target="_blank">Nicki Hicks<br />
</a><a href="http://www.flyte.biz/internet-marketing/seo/" target="_blank">All search engines were not created equal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/5-ways-to-rank-better-at-bing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the Consensus with Bing?</title>
		<link>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/whats-the-consensus-with-bing</link>
		<comments>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/whats-the-consensus-with-bing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maine-seo.com/?p=1026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit it, I&#8217;ve been positively ignorant of the fact that there&#8217;s another search engine out there willing to trifle with the power of Google; you&#8217;ll have to excuse my hesitation, it&#8217;s just that we&#8217;ve seen it before. I put it out to the people, and here&#8217;s what I got: What people like &#8220;I love the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fsearch-engines%2Fwhats-the-consensus-with-bing"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fsearch-engines%2Fwhats-the-consensus-with-bing&amp;source=flytenewmedia&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1027" title="bing" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bing-300x231.jpg" alt="bing" width="240" height="185" />I admit it, I&#8217;ve been positively ignorant of the fact that there&#8217;s another search engine out there willing to trifle with the power of Google; you&#8217;ll have to excuse my hesitation, it&#8217;s just that <a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/google/is-cuil-really-all-that-cool" target="_blank">we&#8217;ve seen it before</a>.</p>
<p>I <a href="http://twitter.com/nickihicks/status/2637383374" target="_blank">put it out to the people</a>, and here&#8217;s what I got:</p>
<h3>What people like</h3>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;I love the Travel Search feature Bing has.  It has a cool Price Predictor which tells you whether to buy now or wait for a better price. Imports prices from all over <img src='http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/ccmaine" target="_blank">@ccmaine</a></li>
<li>&#8220;Love how Bing lists its videos.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.twitter.com/sarah_wallace" target="_blank">@sarah_wallace</a></li>
<li>&#8220;I&#8217;ve had really good luck with it when search for something in the form of a question or multiple word descriptions.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/MeRAbiz" target="_blank">@MeRAbiz</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>What people don&#8217;t like</h3>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Nothing special (I&#8217;m kind of partial to Google though)&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/musicsgf" target="_blank">@musicsGF</a></li>
<li>&#8220;Like Chrome, adequate, but no compelling reason to switch&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/JMunk">@JMunk</a></li>
<li>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think the search itself offers much new; some of the media type searches (images, for example) are good alternatives&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/justinrussell" target="_blank">@justinrussell</a></li>
<li>&#8220;Like the Cashback and Live ID integration&#8230;not a huge fan of the results or auto-suggestions really&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/fzzylogic?ref=mf" target="_blank">Justin Cox</a></li>
<li>&#8220;To be honest I haven&#8217;t even compared it&#8217;s functionality to ever awesome Google, I&#8217;m too distracted by the pretty background pictures!&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/kwallace2" target="_blank">@kwallace2</a></li>
</ul>
<p>There you have it, folks. There are of course the <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1016" target="_blank">negative reviews</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/apparently-bing-is-something-of-a-hit/" target="_blank">(somewhat) positive ones</a>. But what it really comes down to is&#8230;what do you like the best? It looks like that <strong>Google is still king</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/google.com+bing.com+yahoo.com"><img class="size-full wp-image-1031 aligncenter" title="alexa google vs bing vs yahoo" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/alexa-google-vs-bing-vs-yahoo.jpg" alt="alexa google vs bing vs yahoo" width="434" height="198" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=maine+seo&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;qs=n" target="_blank">Nicki Hicks<br />
I guess I can&#8217;t complain I rank #1 on bing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engines/whats-the-consensus-with-bing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s All About the Click: Fundamentals of Paid Search Marketing &#8211; Webinar with George Seybold</title>
		<link>http://www.maine-seo.com/paid-search/its-all-about-the-click-fundamentals-of-paid-search-marketing-webinar-with-george-seybold</link>
		<comments>http://www.maine-seo.com/paid-search/its-all-about-the-click-fundamentals-of-paid-search-marketing-webinar-with-george-seybold#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click (PPC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maine-seo.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just watched the MarketingProfs&#8217; webinar with George Seybold, head of Seybold Scientific, put on a great presentation on PPC basics. Here are some of my notes from the presentation: Advertising Basics Traditional Advertising &#8211; TV, radio, print; impression based Banner Advertising &#8211; online equivalent of traditional advertising; impression based Pay-per-click &#8211; performance based &#8230;and they all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fpaid-search%2Fits-all-about-the-click-fundamentals-of-paid-search-marketing-webinar-with-george-seybold"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fpaid-search%2Fits-all-about-the-click-fundamentals-of-paid-search-marketing-webinar-with-george-seybold&amp;source=flytenewmedia&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I just watched the <a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/marketing/online-seminars/206" target="_blank">MarketingProfs&#8217; webinar</a> with George Seybold, head of <a href="http://www.seyboldinc.com/" target="_blank">Seybold Scientific</a>, put on a great presentation on PPC basics. Here are some of my notes from the presentation:</p>
<p><strong>Advertising Basics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Traditional Advertising &#8211; TV, radio, print; impression based</li>
<li>Banner Advertising &#8211; online equivalent of traditional advertising; impression based</li>
<li>Pay-per-click &#8211; performance based</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>&#8230;and they all work together&#8230;</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Traditional &#8211; awareness, informative, branding, sales lead</li>
<li>Banner Ads &#8211; awareness, informative, branding, sales lead</li>
<li>Pay-per-click (PPC) &#8211; awareness, informative, branding, sales lead, closest point of sale</li>
<li>The way they flow:<br />
Awareness &amp; Branding &#8211;&gt; Research &#8211;&gt; Promotion &amp; Point of Sale</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Example: Car Buying</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Awareness: TV, radio, search</li>
<li>Consideration: website, brochures</li>
<li>Point of Sale: PPC, website</li>
</ol>
<p>Great quote from George: <em>You have to be present to be selected.</em></p>
<p><strong>Rules of Thumb</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>PPC is not necessarily good for&#8230;<br />
- building awareness<br />
- branding</li>
<li>PPC is good for&#8230;<br />
- incentive</li>
<li>Banners are great for&#8230;<br />
- branding</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why do we search?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Answer questions</li>
<li>Find information</li>
<li>Validation</li>
<li>Entertainment</li>
<li>Find products/services</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>How PPC providers differ</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Cost &#8211; Google is approximately 50% more expensive than other search engines</li>
<li>Relevance &#8211; Google gets 63% of total traffic</li>
<li>Demographics &#8211; Ask heavily targets women</li>
<li>Shopping &#8211; New market entrant Bing is focused on Ecommerce</li>
<li>Psychographic &#8211; Yahoo targets the financial/news-focused</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Yahoo</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Lower cost per click (CPC)</li>
<li>Financial/news target</li>
<li>Attempt to drive searchers to the search engine</li>
<li>Yahoo Mail solution is very popular</li>
<li>2nd largest search provider</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Google</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Greatest search</li>
<li>De-facto search standard</li>
<li>Most advanced/relevant results</li>
<li>More advertiser competition, more searchers to balance</li>
<li>Largest content network (Adsense)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Ask</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Female demographic</li>
<li>NO right hand column advertising</li>
<li>Sponsored links are (almost) indistinguishable from organic results</li>
<li>Lower CPC</li>
<li>Less overall search result</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Bing</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>New! (as of about a week ago)</li>
<li>Targeted for Ecommerce</li>
<li>Freshly positioned as the &#8220;new type&#8221; of search engine</li>
<li>Hybrid of Google, Yahoo, and Ask</li>
<li>Decision-based search results</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Ad Creation Basics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Keyword selection<br />
- Use descriptive words (cd player vs. cd)<br />
- Think like your customer (cd album vs. compact disk)<br />
- Balance of search volume to competition (mp3 cds vs. best cd)<br />
- Longer tail search term is closer to the sale (red nike tennis shoes vs. tennis shoes) <br />
- Recognize terms used across other industries (CD &#8211; compact disk vs. CD &#8211; Certificate of Deposit) </li>
<li>Can I pay for the first position in Google? No&#8230;quality score. </li>
<li>Quality Score &#8211; Google&#8217;s algorithm for PPC, based on: <br />
 1. relevance of keyword<br />
2. performance of ad click through rate (CTR) </li>
<li>Ad Copy<br />
- Needs an incentive, call-to-action<br />
-  Use geo-targeting (region, zip code, country, language, etc.)</li>
<li>Measurement/Goals: Google Analytics<br />
Focus on:<br />
- New visitors (should be upwards of 75%)<br />
- # Pages/visit<br />
- Bounce rate (should be less than 50%) </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Some PPC Jargon<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Keywords &#8211; what your consumers are searching for</li>
<li>Impressions &#8211; number of times ad is presented</li>
<li>Cost-per-click (CPC) &#8211; money you pay for a click</li>
<li>Click-thru-rate (CTR) &#8211; ration of impressions/clicks</li>
<li>Conversion &#8211; reaching a desired goal</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://flyte.biz/internet-marketing/" target="_blank">Nicki Hicks<br />
Maine SEM </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maine-seo.com/paid-search/its-all-about-the-click-fundamentals-of-paid-search-marketing-webinar-with-george-seybold/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

