<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maine SEO Blog &#187; Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maine-seo.com/tag/chrome/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maine-seo.com</link>
	<description>A blog on SEO and SEM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google, Stick To What You&#8217;re Good At</title>
		<link>http://www.maine-seo.com/google/google-stick-to-what-youre-good-at</link>
		<comments>http://www.maine-seo.com/google/google-stick-to-what-youre-good-at#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maine-seo.com/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, Google released Chrome.  It was highly anticipated and, yes, has a lot of great features.  It&#8217;s also gotten a general &#8220;so-so&#8221; reaction.  But after four months, has anyone said &#8220;Wow. That really turned out to be the best browser!&#8221;?  Not so much. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m a huge advocate for Google.  This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fgoogle%2Fgoogle-stick-to-what-youre-good-at"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fgoogle%2Fgoogle-stick-to-what-youre-good-at&amp;source=flytenewmedia&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Last year, <a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/google/google-chrome-good-bad-ugly" target="_blank">Google released Chrome</a>.  It was highly anticipated and, yes, has a lot of great features.  It&#8217;s also gotten a <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/019143.html" target="_blank">general &#8220;so-so&#8221; reaction</a>.  But after four months, has anyone said &#8220;Wow. That really turned out to be the best browser!&#8221;?  Not so much.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m a huge advocate for Google.  This just makes me ask: Google, why not stick to what you&#8217;re good at? <strong> </strong>Remember that little monopolistic situation you&#8217;ve got going on in <strong>Search? </strong></p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it a basic rule of good business and the inevitable death of so many in niche industries: don&#8217;t try to do a bunch of things mediocre, just do one thing really, really good? (Disclaimer: I&#8217;m in no way saying Google is mediocre.)</p>
<p>I still have two major issues:</p>
<ol>
<li>There is still no Mac version. (I may or may not be edging bitter with that one&#8230;)</li>
<li>My FireFox extensions are still near and dear.</li>
</ol>
<p>But don&#8217;t take my word for it.  Take a look at the numbers&#8230;.</p>
<h6 style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/web-browser-usage.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-456" title="web browser usage" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/web-browser-usage.jpg" alt="" width="285" height="445" /></a>Graph from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>.</h6>
<p>I think these numbers will speak more highly than my rant &#8211; just over 1% of people use Chrome.  But I have to wonder&#8230;what would browser usage look like <em>had Chrome been released <strong>before</strong> Firefox 3</em>?</p>
<p><a href="http://flyte.biz/about/staff.php#nicki" target="_blank">Nicki Hicks<br />
Who could resist a cute, cuddly fox for a mascot?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maine-seo.com/google/google-stick-to-what-youre-good-at/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome &#8211; The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title>
		<link>http://www.maine-seo.com/google/google-chrome-good-bad-ugly</link>
		<comments>http://www.maine-seo.com/google/google-chrome-good-bad-ugly#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maine-seo.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#8217;s official.  As of September 2, 2008 at 2pm EST, Google released its very own web browser: Google Chrome. Yes, another Chrome post.  I know there&#8217;s a million out there.  But I noticed that many of them are very one-sided: either Chrome rocks or it stinks. (Strange I know, who&#8217;d have thought&#8230;opinionated bloggers?!)  I&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fgoogle%2Fgoogle-chrome-good-bad-ugly"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fgoogle%2Fgoogle-chrome-good-bad-ugly&amp;source=flytenewmedia&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s official.  As of September 2, 2008 at 2pm EST, Google released its very own web browser: <a href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, another Chrome post.  I know there&#8217;s a million out there.  But I noticed that many of them are very one-sided: either Chrome rocks or it stinks. (Strange I know, who&#8217;d have thought&#8230;opinionated bloggers?!)  I&#8217;d like to take a look at all sides though, especially what I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<h4><strong>The Bad</strong></h4>
<p>(For when asked &#8220;I have good news and bad news, what do you want first?&#8221; I always reply, &#8220;the bad&#8221;.)</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>I&#8217;m still waiting on the Mac</strong> (and Linux, if we want to get technical about it) <strong>version</strong>.  Being on a Mac OS, I&#8217;m obviously partial.  So running IE on my Parallels program is really not ideal.  Though, from what I&#8217;ve been able to play around with, it is pretty neat.</li>
<li><strong>Is it any better than Firefox 3?</strong> I think that&#8217;s one of the bigger questions.  Even in the short time FF3 has been available, I&#8217;ve become a huge fan.  Chrome has many of the cool gadgets that FF3 has.  So the argument remains: Why should I switch over?</li>
<li><strong>Where are the plug-ins?</strong> I have so many plug-ins in my FF browser that I have to turn some of them off so I actually have a large enough window to be able to view something!  I&#8217;m sure Chrome won&#8217;t take long, but when I go for my Gmail icon, I have to remember that I have applications now!</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s just plain hard to switch browsers.</strong> (Yes, now I&#8217;m whining.)  More than anything, how am I supposed to remember the dozens (if not hundreds) of passwords and logins that Firefox has saved for me?  (Obviously the important ones I have written down.)  But it&#8217;s going to take a while to get all those passwords automatic again!</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>The Good</strong></h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Increased Security </strong>(aka The Sandbox)<strong><br />
</strong></li>
<li><strong>Enhanced Search Options. </strong>And no, they do not MAKE you search in Google.  You can select whatever default search engine you&#8217;d like.</li>
<li><strong>Individual Tabs. </strong>Each tab runs as its own process, so if the application fails for any reason, ONLY that page and tab will close.  Pretty handy when you have a lot going on.</li>
<li><strong>Thumbnails of your most visited sites</strong> on the homepage.  This is just plain cool and helpful.</li>
<li><strong>Not tied to any other Google application.</strong> Man oh man, has there been an uproar about this one! Just check out any of <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-license-agreement/" target="_blank">Matt Cutts&#8217; recent posts</a> on the matter!</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>The Ugly</strong></h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>&#8220;Google is taking over the world.&#8221;</strong> Or at least the Web.  There will always be negative rumors and connotations flying around a large, successful organization.  Take a little <a href="http://www.sugarrae.com/twitter-lays-down-for-google/" target="_blank">Google-Twitter situation</a> that took place Wednesday!</li>
</ul>
<p>All in all, I think Google Chrome will do well.  I can definitely see how users going from Internet Explorer to Chrome will be amazed by the switch.  But again, for FF3 users, the wow factor really just isn&#8217;t there..yet.  I&#8217;m just waiting for a Google OS now!!</p>
<p><a href="http://flyte.biz/about/staff.php#nicki" target="_blank">Nicki Hicks<br />
Committed to Firefox (for now)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maine-seo.com/google/google-chrome-good-bad-ugly/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

