<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maine SEO Blog &#187; PageRank sculpting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maine-seo.com/tag/pagerank-sculpting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maine-seo.com</link>
	<description>A blog on SEO and SEM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PageRank Sculpting Isn&#8217;t What It Used To Be (or What&#8217;s Going on with Nofollow?)</title>
		<link>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engine-marketing/pagerank-sculpting-isnt-what-it-used-to-be-or-whats-going-on-with-nofollow</link>
		<comments>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engine-marketing/pagerank-sculpting-isnt-what-it-used-to-be-or-whats-going-on-with-nofollow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank sculpting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maine-seo.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of talk of late about PageRank sculpting as it relates to nofollow tags. Why? Because the way PageRank works changed just over a year ago and now they&#8217;re telling us. PageRank has always flowed like this to pages from links that are not nofollowed (affectionately known as dofollow). When you add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fsearch-engine-marketing%2Fpagerank-sculpting-isnt-what-it-used-to-be-or-whats-going-on-with-nofollow"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maine-seo.com%2Fsearch-engine-marketing%2Fpagerank-sculpting-isnt-what-it-used-to-be-or-whats-going-on-with-nofollow&amp;source=flytenewmedia&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk of late about PageRank sculpting as it relates to nofollow tags. Why? Because the way PageRank works changed just over a year ago and <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" target="_blank">now they&#8217;re telling us</a>.</p>
<p>PageRank has always flowed like this to pages from links that are not nofollowed (affectionately known as dofollow).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-997  aligncenter" title="pagerank before" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pr-before.jpg" alt="pagerank before" width="396" height="232" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engine-marketing/to-nofollow-or-not-to-nofollow" target="_blank">When you add a nofollow tag to a link, you stop PageRank from flowing</a>. This result remains unchanged; but now, you&#8217;re not adding any benefit to the other (dofollow) links on the page. They still pass the same percentage of PageRank, as if <em>all</em> the links were dofollow:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-998  aligncenter" title="pagerank now" src="http://www.maine-seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pr-after.jpg" alt="pagerank now" width="396" height="228" /></p>
<p><strong>What does this mean? <span style="font-weight: normal;">Nofollow isn&#8217;t as strong as it once was. You can&#8217;t use it to PageRank sculpt. </span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Should you stop nofollowing? <span style="font-weight: normal;">No, I don&#8217;t think so. To those pages like your Search page, Contact page, and perhaps Privacy Policy, I think nofollows are still a great idea. They are pages where you wouldn&#8217;t necessarily need PageRank to flow.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>There&#8217;s a lesson to learn here.</strong> If you don&#8217;t trust a website enough (or just don&#8217;t want to pass the PageRank) to dofollow a link, you probably shouldn&#8217;t be linking in the first place.</p>
<p><strong>The right way to PageRank sculpt?</strong> An intuitive site architecture &#8211; for both searchers <em>and</em> search engines.</p>
<p><a href="http://flyte.biz/about/staff.php#nicki" target="_blank">Nicki Hicks<br />
Sculpting is an art</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maine-seo.com/search-engine-marketing/pagerank-sculpting-isnt-what-it-used-to-be-or-whats-going-on-with-nofollow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

